I've been hearing about his issue from younger
writers in the trenches of college writing programs, and in their
encounters with "progressive" editors and agents. But
personally I've been ignoring it in hopes that it will go away. I've been ignoring the issue of
"cultural appropriation" for same way reason I try not to use the
name D***** T*****: talking about him gives him credence. Legitimacy. Hey, if
we fiction writers can't use our imaginations to cross boundaries and create
characters unlike ourselves, we're doomed as a species. But the issue doesn't
seem to going away away. A recent New York Times op-ed piece by
Lionel Shriver (9/23/16) has generated a lot of buzz. Here's her piece:
And below is part of two letters to the NYT in
reply:
"No one is saying Ms.
Shriver should be put in jail or that it should be illegal to publish a book
she writes from the perspective of an oppressed person of color or some other
position about which she can have little personal experience. In the same vein,
it shouldn’t be illegal for me to post an article about how that reflects on
her, and suggesting that other people join me in not reading it...."
Uma B. Gaffney
"If the great
evolutionary triumph of our species is the capacity to reason and understand,
then for millennials to define themselves strictly in terms of their race, age,
gender or ethnicity is to be forever stranded on a smaller planet. When we
allow anyone of any age to police our imaginations, to condemn us to writing
plays, poems and novels only about people like ourselves, then we’re doomed as
artists and humanists. The best thing about our capacity for abstract thinking
is that it allows us to imagine what it’s like to be someone else (saint or
sinner), and might help us become more empathetic...." Fengar Gael
My take? (Sorry, can't shed the highlight). The first
letter is dripping with assumptions and "correctness" if not
literary fascism. The second is quite a nice counter. All the
writers I know personally are quite sensitive to the issue cultural
appropriation. We're simply not going to do it if it's a bridge too far,
that is, if we don't have deep personal experience and knowledge about the
subject at hand. We have to earn the right to write the character very
different than ourselves. And if we've done our work–deep, sincere,
empathetic immersion in which we imagine the inner and out life of the
character–then we should have at it. After all, in the business of
fiction writing the rules are made to be broken.
Postscript: here's breaking news/response to the issue of cultural appropriation:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/opinion/elena-ferrante-and-the-power-of-appropriation.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region&_r=0
Postscript: here's breaking news/response to the issue of cultural appropriation:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/opinion/elena-ferrante-and-the-power-of-appropriation.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region®ion=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment